2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-9.
Because 2011 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Calais. (350 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Calais.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2011 Holden Calais | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | CX-9 | Calais |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3726 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 273 HP | 278 HP |
Torque | 366 Nm | 350 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |