2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2012 BMW 116
To start off, 2012 BMW 116 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 2012 BMW 116. (116 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2012 BMW 116.
Because 2012 BMW 116 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 BMW 116. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 BMW 116. (260 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 BMW 116.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2012 BMW 116 | |
Make | Mazda | BMW |
Model | CX-9 | 116 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3727 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 268 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4239 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1421 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 51 L |