2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2012 Peugeot 107
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 107 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,727 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (268 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 2012 Peugeot 107. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2012 Peugeot 107.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (269 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Peugeot 107. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Peugeot 107. 2009 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot 107 has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot 107 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2012 Peugeot 107 | |
| Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
| Model | CX-9 | 107 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3727 cc | 998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 268 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 269 Nm | 93 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 35 L |
