2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe

To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (327 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda CX-9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe weights approximately 1504 kg more than 2009 Mazda CX-9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe (498 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda CX-9. (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda CX-9.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda CX-9 2013 Chevrolet Tahoe
Make Mazda Chevrolet
Model CX-9 Tahoe
Year Released 2009 2013
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3724 cc 6000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 273 HP 327 HP
Engine RPM 6250 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 498 Nm
Torque RPM 4500 RPM 4100 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic CVT
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1180 kg 2684 kg
Vehicle Length 5080 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1940 mm 2007 mm
Vehicle Height 1730 mm 1953 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 11.2 L/100km 8.5 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 15.7 L/100km 10.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 93 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]