2009 Mazda CX-9 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda CX-9 would be higher.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda CX-9 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Mazda | Smart |
| Model | CX-9 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | V | electric |
| Horse Power | 273 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5080 mm | 2695 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 1867 mm |
