2009 Mazda MPV vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade

To start off, 2009 Mazda MPV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda MPV (134 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda MPV weights approximately 970 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2002 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda MPV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda MPV (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: