2009 Mazda MPV vs. 2003 Renault Clio

To start off, 2009 Mazda MPV is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda MPV (134 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (96 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda MPV weights approximately 680 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda MPV (310 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2003 Renault Clio has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda MPV has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda MPV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Renault Clio will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda MPV 2003 Renault Clio
Make Mazda Renault
Model MPV Clio
Year Released 2009 2003
Body Type Minivan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 134 HP 96 HP
Engine RPM 3500 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 127 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3750 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 18.4:1 10.0:1
Top Speed 176 km/hour 175 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 13.2 seconds 12.9 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1710 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 3820 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 7.1 L/100km 7.3 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]