2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2007 Daewoo Tocsa
To start off, 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Daewoo Tocsa would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata (158 HP) has 10 more horse power than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata should accelerate faster than 2007 Daewoo Tocsa.
Because 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Daewoo Tocsa (320 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (188 Nm). This means 2007 Daewoo Tocsa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2007 Daewoo Tocsa | |
Make | Mazda | Daewoo |
Model | MX-5 Miata | Tocsa |
Year Released | 2009 | 2007 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 188 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |