2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Holden Epica would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata (167 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2008 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata should accelerate faster than 2008 Holden Epica.
Because 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata. (190 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | MX-5 Miata | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 167 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2340 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |