2009 Mazda Premacy vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda Premacy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda Premacy would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Premacy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 49 more horse power than 2009 Mazda Premacy. (99 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda Premacy.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda Premacy. (230 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda Premacy.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda Premacy | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | Premacy | Epica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 99 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 230 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.6 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |