2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1950 Triumph Roadster
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Triumph Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Triumph Roadster would be higher. At 2,088 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Triumph Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (71 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1950 Triumph Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Triumph Roadster. (147 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Triumph Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1950 Triumph Roadster | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | RX-8 | Roadster |
Year Released | 2009 | 1950 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 2088 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 54 L |