2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1961 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1961 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 335 kg more than 1961 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1961 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-8 | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |