2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1966 Morris Oxford
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,622 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Morris Oxford is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 172 more horse power than 1966 Morris Oxford. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Morris Oxford weights approximately 5 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1966 Morris Oxford | |
Make | Mazda | Morris |
Model | RX-8 | Oxford |
Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |