2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1971 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,306 cc, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1971 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1971 Zastava 1300.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1971 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | RX-8 | 1300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1971 |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2430 mm |