2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (95 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (147 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-8 | 140 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 95 HP |
Torque | 216 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2620 mm |