2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1980 Toyota Tercel
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Toyota Tercel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Toyota Tercel would be higher. At 1,307 cc, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Toyota Tercel. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1980 Toyota Tercel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1980 Toyota Tercel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Tercel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1980 Toyota Tercel | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-8 | Tercel |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1307 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 70 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |