2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1983 Peugeot 305
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Peugeot 305. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Peugeot 305 would be higher. At 1,905 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Peugeot 305 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1983 Peugeot 305. (65 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1983 Peugeot 305. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1983 Peugeot 305. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Peugeot 305, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Peugeot 305. (122 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Peugeot 305.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1983 Peugeot 305 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | RX-8 | 305 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 65 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |