2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1993 Volvo 960
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1993 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1993 Volvo 960. (187 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1993 Volvo 960. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1993 Volvo 960 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1993 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-8 | 960 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1993 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2780 mm |