2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1996 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura TL.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | RX-8 | TL |
Year Released | 2009 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2840 mm |