2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz C

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1996 Mercedes-Benz C. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 285 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mercedes-Benz C. (170 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mercedes-Benz C.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda RX-8 1996 Mercedes-Benz C
Make Mazda Mercedes-Benz
Model RX-8 C
Year Released 2009 1996
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1308 cc 1797 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary in-line
Horse Power 232 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 8500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 216 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 5500 RPM 4200 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1125 kg 1410 kg
Vehicle Length 4470 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 62 L