2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 1997 Opel Omega
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Opel Omega would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1997 Opel Omega. (114 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1997 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Opel Omega. (178 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Opel Omega.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 1997 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | RX-8 | Omega |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |