2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2003 Renault Scenic II
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Scenic II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Scenic II would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Renault Scenic II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (83 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Renault Scenic II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Scenic II. (191 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Scenic II.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2003 Renault Scenic II | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | Scenic II |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 1461 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 4.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |