2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Renault Scenic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Renault Scenic would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (228 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 279 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Renault Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (211 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-8 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 8200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 48 L |