2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Rover City. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Rover City would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Rover City is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Mazda | Rover |
Model | RX-8 | City |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |