2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2005 Mercury Mountaineer

To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 22 more horse power than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer. (210 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Mercury Mountaineer.

Because 2005 Mercury Mountaineer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mercury Mountaineer (345 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 2005 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mazda RX-8 2005 Mercury Mountaineer
Make Mazda Mercury
Model RX-8 Mountaineer
Year Released 2009 2005
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1306 cc 4015 cc
Engine Type dual-disk rotary V
Horse Power 232 HP 210 HP
Torque 216 Nm 345 Nm
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4470 mm 4860 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Consumption 10.7 L/100km 12.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 14.7 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 13.1 L/100km 13.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 85 L