2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2006 Nissan Interstar
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Interstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Interstar would be higher. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 2006 Nissan Interstar. (112 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2006 Nissan Interstar.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Interstar (290 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Interstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2006 Nissan Interstar | |
| Make | Mazda | Nissan |
| Model | RX-8 | Interstar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 100 L |
