2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2008 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2008 Toyota Celica. (190 HP @ 7800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2008 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Celica weights approximately 90 kg more than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Toyota Celica. (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2008 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mazda | Toyota |
Model | RX-8 | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1307 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 55 L |