2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Acura RL
To start off, 2010 Acura RL is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Acura RL (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2010 Acura RL is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Acura RL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Acura RL (367 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2010 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda RX-8. 2010 Acura RL has automatic transmission and 2009 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2009 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Acura RL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Acura RL | |
Make | Mazda | Acura |
Model | RX-8 | RL |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 367 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4971 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2799 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 73 L |