2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP) has 93 more horse power than 2010 Holden Cruze. (139 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Cruze. (176 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | RX-8 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1308 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 139 HP |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 176 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2685 mm |
