2009 Mazda RX-8 vs. 2010 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2010 Nissan Micra is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda RX-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda RX-8 would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2010 Nissan Micra. (87 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2010 Nissan Micra.
Because 2009 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Nissan Micra. (128 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda RX-8 | 2010 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Mazda | Nissan |
Model | RX-8 | Micra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1306 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 87 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 46 L |