2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 1942 Simca 5
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1942 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1942 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 565 kg more than 1942 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1942 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda Tribute | 1942 Simca 5 | |
Make | Mazda | Simca |
Model | Tribute | 5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 570 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2010 mm |