2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 1948 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 61 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1948 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1948 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1948 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1948 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 505 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute.
Because 1948 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1948 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda Tribute | 1948 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Tribute | PV 60 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1948 |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2850 mm |