2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 1965 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1965 Wartburg 312. (36 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1965 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 165 kg more than 1965 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda Tribute (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mazda Tribute | 1965 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Mazda | Wartburg |
Model | Tribute | 312 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 184 Nm | 81 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 43 L |