2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Mazda Tribute is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda Tribute (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 900 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda Tribute | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | Tribute | 4 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 171 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 7.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 60 L |
