2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2009 Mazda Tribute and 2009 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2009). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 207 more horse power than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (153 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda Tribute | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | Tribute | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
