2009 Mazda Tribute vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mazda Tribute would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1504 kg more than 2009 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2009 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 536 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda Tribute. (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mazda Tribute | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Mazda | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Tribute | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 184 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1125 kg | 2629 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1598 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 8.9 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 8.3 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 100 L |
