2009 Mercedes-Benz A vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz A is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 154 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz A.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz A, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass has automatic transmission and 2009 Mercedes-Benz A has manual transmission. 2009 Mercedes-Benz A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz A | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Oldsmobile |
Model | A | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1326 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2760 mm |