2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1953 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Riley RM A would be higher. At 2,148 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Riley RM A weights approximately 10 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 1953 Riley RM A | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Riley |
Model | C | RM A |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1496 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 169 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2870 mm |