2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1963 Zastava 1300
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (181 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1963 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 1850 kg more than 1963 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (241 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 1963 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
Model | C | 1300 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1295 cc |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 241 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2430 mm |