2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1966 Triumph Vitesse
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph Vitesse. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph Vitesse would be higher. At 2,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (120 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1966 Triumph Vitesse. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph Vitesse.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 1966 Triumph Vitesse | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Triumph |
| Model | C | Vitesse |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2148 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.3 mm | 76 mm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 38 L |
