2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (181 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 455 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (240 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Zastava |
| Model | C | 102 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2160 mm |
