2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander would be higher. At 2,374 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (158 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (154 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 1360 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (231 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander. (220 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mitsubishi |
Model | C | Outlander |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2374 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 231 Nm | 220 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 59 L |