2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet
To start off, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (181 HP) has 82 more horse power than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C has automatic transmission and 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet has manual transmission. 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 2012 Aston Martin Cygnet | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Aston Martin |
Model | C | Cygnet |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1300 cc |
Horse Power | 181 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.4 L/100km | 4 L/100km |