2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2012 Mazda 3

To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (141 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.

Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 3 (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. (220 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mercedes-Benz C 2012 Mazda 3
Make Mercedes-Benz Mazda
Model C 3
Year Released 2009 2012
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1795 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 141 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 220 Nm 360 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 1800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1450 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 55 L