2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2012 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2012 Nissan Pixo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 2,996 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (228 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Pixo. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Pixo.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 2012 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Nissan |
| Model | C | Pixo |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2996 cc | 996 cc |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 242 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.5 seconds | 13.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2360 mm |
