2009 Mercedes-Benz C vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 97 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (301 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Mini |
| Model | C | Countryman |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 301 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.1 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1555 kg | 1458 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1561 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 47 L |
