2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC vs. 1981 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC (181 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC should accelerate faster than 1981 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC weights approximately 515 kg more than 1981 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC (250 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC 1981 Mercury Lynx
Make Mercedes-Benz Mercury
Model CLC Lynx
Year Released 2009 1981
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1795 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 181 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 250 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 85 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.5:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1465 kg 950 kg
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2400 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]