2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC vs. 2010 Holden Epica

To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC (181 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.

Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC. (250 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Mercedes-Benz CLC 2010 Holden Epica
Make Mercedes-Benz Holden
Model CLC Epica
Year Released 2009 2010
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1795 cc 1991 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 181 HP 148 HP
Torque 250 Nm 320 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4460 mm 4805 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2720 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.4 L/100km 7.5 L/100km