2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1951 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 6,208 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (877 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 769 more horse power than 1951 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1951 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 108 kg more than 1951 Talbot Baby. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1951 Talbot Baby | |
| Make | Mercedes-Benz | Talbot |
| Model | CLK | Baby |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 6208 cc | 2690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 877 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1758 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 5060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 3130 mm |
