2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK vs. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 5,460 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (382 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK weights approximately 1830 kg more than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK (530 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 402 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Sunbeam Alpine.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Mercedes-Benz CLK | 1964 Sunbeam Alpine | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Sunbeam |
Model | CLK | Alpine |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5460 cc | 1592 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 382 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 530 Nm | 128 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.7:1 | 9.1:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2830 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |